This in addition to the same amount of Graviola and Cat’s Claw! Wow. Potent indeed!
I’ll assume you already know what Bloodroot is used for: after all, you arrived HERE. Well done. If not, please take a look at www.bloodrootsalve.com.
Anyway, we are so proud of our new formulation that I thought I’d tell you the story of how they came into being.
When we started formulating Bloodroot Capsules a few years ago, the first thing that stood out for us was how little of the Bloodroot herb was actually inside the capsules that were available at the time. As an example, Best-On-Earth-Product’s capsules contain somewhere around 30mg per capsule.
A medium daily dose of, say, 600 mg would therefore require 20 capsules! Ridiculous. Who on earth is going to take 20 capsules every day?
So we formulated the “Double-Strength” Capsules with 62mg per capsule, which halves the number of capsules that a person would need to take. A huge improvement. Hence “Double-Strength”. These have been a great success with literally hundreds of positive feedback messages.
Now we’ve taken it even one step further. In addition to Bloodroot, we decided to add generous amounts of Cat’s Claw and Graviola as both support the effectiveness of Bloodroot.
The result: Our new “Triple-Strength” Bloodroot Capsules. Yes, they contain 100mg of Bloodroot, 100mg of Graviola and 100mg of Cat’s Claw. The most POTENT Bloodroot capsules ever formulated.
- FEWER CAPSULES TO INGEST: Use far fewer capsules for the same effect. One “Triple-Strength” Capsule contains as much as one-and-a-half “Double-Strength” Capsules, and as much as THREE “normal” capsules available from other vendors. What a relief not having to take handfuls of capsules!
- BEST PRICE: Consider the cost:
- One “Triple-Strength” capsule costs 44.8 cents (including shipping),
- This is the equivalent of 1.5 “Double-Strength” capsules which would cost 58.2 cents for the same amount of Bloodroot
- The equivalent of three “normal” capsules which would cost $1.51 for the same effect. Amazing. (By the way, the price for “normal” capsules is based on paying Best-On-Earth $45.21 for 90 capsules including shipping)
- BEST FORMULATION: We add the herbs that are KNOWN to be effective. No cheap herbs with nice-sounding names, no fillers, no nonsense. Bloodroot, Graviola and Cat’s Claw are what you are looking for. Anything else is just for marketing.
- RELIABLE SOURCES: Our herbal powders are sourced from a most reliable producer and wholesaler, and we have Certificates of Authenticity for each batch we buy.
- GREAT SHIPPING: We ship reliably five days a week. The US postal service pick up our parcels at about 1PM every weekday, you get a tracking code, and the USPS is surprisingly reliable. Great value.
As a fan of herbal medicine, you will understand why we cannot make medical claims about Bloodroot or any other herb here (FDA), but I’m sure you know how to research effectively. After all, you have arrived here!
Morgellons Direct is the best possible way to enjoy the benefits of a Saturated Solution of Potassium Iodide (SSKI) at home, being the only complete kit for creating SSKI yourself.
Creating your own solutions of potassium iodide with Morgellons Direct is the easiest way to know that you have fresh, additive-free, FDA Compliant,
Certified USP SSKI.
The products and the information provided about specific products on or through this site have not been evaluated by the United States Food and Drug Administration and are not approved to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent disease. The information provided on this site, product labeling or packaging is for informational purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for advice from your physician or other health care professional. You should not use the information on this site for diagnosis or treatment of any health problem or for prescription of any medication or other treatment. You should consult with a healthcare professional before before taking any medication or supplements, especially if you are pregnant or if you have or suspect you might have a health problem.
Written by: Brandi Monasco
29 US States have legalized the use of cannabis for medicinal use. And although cannabis has been legalized in these states for medical purposes, there are still many people who are skeptical about the benefits of using cannabis medicinally. In fact, many of these people include doctors from various areas of medicine as well as medical organizations and government officials.
Pros And Cons Of Cannabis Usage (Based On Scientific Perspectives)
1. Physician Perspectives
Pro: According to Dr. Sanjay Gupta, a Medical Correspondent for CNN, there is promising research that states that cannabis could help children and adults with different types of medical conditions such as Alzheimer’s, cancer and epilepsy. He also states that cannabis could reduce pain and reduce the demand for narcotics.
“Marijuana is a medicine, that should be studied and treated like any other medicine.”
Con: Dr. Stuart Gitlow, the Former President of the ASAM Board of Directors, believes that there is no such thing as medical marijuana and that there are more dangers and risks of using marijuana than there are benefits.
He believes that the risks and negative outcomes of using medical marijuana include loss of productivity, addiction to marijuana, vehicle accidents and psychosis. He also believes that there are more safe medications compared to marijuana.
2. Medical Organizations
Pro: The American College of Physicians believes that since there is scientific evidence for the use and safety of medical marijuana in some clinical conditions, that marijuana’s status should be rescheduled from a schedule 1 controlled substance to a more appropriate schedule.
The ACP also urges that anyone who is using marijuana for medicinal purposes should be protected from criminal or civil penalties.
Con: The American Academy of Ophthalmology does not believe that using marijuana or cannabis products for glaucoma is beneficial, nor do they recommend it. They have found that based on reviews provided by the National Eye Institute and the Institute of Medicine, smoking marijuana produces serious side effects such as an increase in heart rate and a decrease in blood pressure.
The concern is that when blood pressure is decreased, there will be long-term effects on the optic nerve in glaucoma patients.
3. US Government Officials
Pro: Former President Barack Obama states that prescribing medical marijuana as treatment for cancer or glaucoma is no different than prescribing morphine. He also goes on to state that he believes that medical marijuana should be under the same control as other prescription drugs that are prescribed by doctors.
Con: The FDA (US Food and Drug Administration) has another outlook on medical marijuana. They do not support the legalization of medical marijuana and how it is listed as a schedule 1 Controlled Substance, because marijuana has a high potential for abuse and there are no sound scientific studies that support marijuana in treatment of diseases or illnesses.
4. Health Risks
Pro: Dr. Lester Grinspoon, Emeritus Professor of Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, believes that there is little evidence that says that smoking marijuana causes any significant health risk. He also goes on to say that cannabis has been smoked for more than four decades and there have not been any reported cases of lung cancer or emphysema that have been caused by smoking cannabis.
Con: The National Institute on Drug Abuse states that marijuana smoke is an irritant to your lungs and throat just like tobacco smoke and that it can cause a heavy cough during use. The NIDA goes on to state that smoking marijuana can increase respiratory infections and that frequent marijuana users use more sick days from work because of increased respiratory illnesses.
5. More Physician Perspectives
Pro: Dr. Donald Abrams, a professor of Clinical Medicine at the University of California, states “Marijuana is the only anti-nausea medicine that increases appetite,” referring to cancer patients that deal with vomiting, nausea, pain, depression, insomnia and loss of appetite due to chemo and other cancer treatments.
Con: Dr. Bill Frist, who is a former US Senator, cautions against patients using marijuana for medical purposes simply due to “the lack of consistent, repeatable scientific data available to prove marijuana’s benefits.”
6. Marijuana And Pain
Pro: Cannabis contains roughly 5 to 15 percent of THC as well as other cannabinoids that can be therapeutic to the body. According to Dr. Gregory Carter, cannabis helps with pain and there is research that documents that cannabis is safe and efficient to use for pain.
Con: On the other hand, Dr. Gregory Bunt believes that there is no scientific evidence that using cannabis has any effect on relieving pain. However, he does go on to state that there have been analgesic medications that are available that have been found through research to help relieve pain and that are safer and more effective than cannabis.
7. Marijuana Vs. Marinol
Con: There is a synthetic version of cannabis called dronabinol which is one of the active ingredients found in cannabis. This version can be found in pill form. However, using only one ingredient from cannabis does not make dronabinol as effective as cannabis.
According to Mitch Earleywine, PhD, “Many ailments respond better to a combination of marijuana’s active ingredients rather than just one.” He also states that because dronabinol is only available in pill form, it can be hard for patients to swallow.
Con: The California Narcotics Officers Association has a different view on this matter. The association believes that Marinol differs from marijuana because it is FDA approved.
8. Addictiveness Of Marijuana
Pro: Dr. Colin Blakemore and Dr. Leslie Iversen believe that unlike hard drugs, alcohol and nicotine, an individual cannot have withdrawals from stopping the use of cannabis. They also state that many users stop taking cannabis in their twenties or thirties, unlike cigarette smokers.
Con: According to Dr. Nora Volkow, “Evidence clearly indicates that long-term marijuana use can lead to addiction.” She also states that 9 percent of those who try marijuana become addicted to it. The addiction to marijuana can cause a withdrawal syndrome with irritability, sleeping difficulties, cravings and anxiety.
9. “Gateway” Effect
Pro: According to Dr. Ethan Nadelmann, the only connection between using marijuana and other drugs is the nature of the market, not necessarily the “high” of the drug. He also goes on to state that the majority of people who have never used or tried marijuana have gone to use other drugs.
Con: However, Dr. Robert DuPont points out that using marijuana is correlated to using other drugs as well as alcohol. “People who are addicted to marijuana are three times more likely to be addicted to heroin.”
Now, you decide. Do you think that using cannabis is safe and effective for medical reasons or do you oppose the use and legalization of it?
Increase Fat Loss & STOP Aging Skin With A Delicious Mix Of 11 Revitalizing Ingredients:
Finally All Together In One Delicious Red Glass! It’s never been done! We picked the best organic superfoods for a RAPID metabolism. Then we sourced all the antioxidants for stronger, firmer skin. (Everything’s Organic!) Finally, we squeezed them all into one delicious red superfood punch! Try Organifi Red Juice today!
If you’re looking to speak directly with a member of our team regarding your health concerns and how we can help, give us a call: 619-404-3133. We love hearing from you!
An investment in your health is the greatest thing you can ever do in your lifetime. Health is more valuable than houses, cars, jewelry, or fabulous vacations. None of those things mean anything if you’re sick. The Most Exclusive Event in the History of Natural Health Here at The Truth About Cancer, we work hard to bring you the most cutting-edge science as well as emerging natural health treatments that mainstream media simply doesn’t report. No matter how safe and effective these modalities are, no matter the number of lives saved, it doesn’t change the “official” view. The media, medical establishment, and pharmaceutical giants refuse to engage in legitimate conversation and even actively campaign to prevent the knowledge or investigation of these valid therapies. They won’t do anything that upsets their status quo…their bottom line. Holistic health practitioners and doctors who have embraced natural techniques to save their patients are openly mocked. Some have had their reputations destroyed and their careers targeted but we all keep going. Because it’s a matter of life and death. For the last two years, The Truth About Cancer has brought you in contact with brilliant men and women at the top of their fields. They’ve featured on our videos, given us interviews, and written exclusive articles for our readers. Now we’re taking it one step further. It’s time to do something powerful, something amazing in our fight to prevent, fight, and beat cancer. It’s critical that you join us for a once-in-a-lifetime event that will give you access to people who are blazing the path to stopping cancer forever! The Ultimate Live Symposium to Fight Cancer! October 14th through 16th, you have the opportunity to be part of something that can absolutely change your life. We’re bringing together more than 40 speakers who are going to give more than 60 presentations about what you can do to keep this devastating disease from destroying your life or the life of someone you love. You simply cannot afford to miss it. I’m talking about The Truth About Cancer – Ultimate Live Symposium where we’re bringing together luminaries in natural health who have agreed to share their research, insight, and incredible belief in the effective (but silenced) methods to stop the deaths caused by cancer. Enjoy three days of LIVE talks by more than 40 of the most influential and respected names in the natural health field. Right now, we’ve sold out of tickets to join in person but you can still be with us as we live-stream this unbelievable collection of men and women dedicated to the prevention and eradication of cancer in the human body. The Truth About Cancer – Ultimate LIVE Symposium is your chance to take part in something that’s never been done before and witness history being made! These speakers are superstars in the natural health industry. Never before have so many come together to educate the public about the real ways you can stop cancer right now, today. Sign up right now to be part of history. Don’t wait. The Truth About Cancer – Ultimate Live Symposium is going to change the lives of millions and you should be one of them!
It’s the next step in our quest to stop cancer from taking your life or the life of someone you love. You need to be part of this spectacular event. For your present and your future, to prevent cancer from ravaging your body or claiming your life, you need to join us.
Breathe in … breathe out.
Ahh. Hooray for oxygen, the element that keeps much of life on Earth humming.
Element No. 8 on the Periodic Table of the Elements is a colorless gas that makes up 21 percent of Earth’s atmosphere. Because it’s all around, oxygen is easy to dismiss as dull and inert; in fact, it’s the most reactive of the non-metallic elements.
Earth has been oxygenated for about 2.3 billion to 2.4 billion years, and levels began to creep up at least 2.5 billion years ago, according to a 2007 NASA-funded study. No one knows quite why this lung-friendly gas suddenly became a significant part of the atmosphere, but it’s possible that geologic changes on Earth led to oxygen produced by photosynthesizing organisms sticking around, rather than being consumed in geologic reactions, according to the study researchers.
Just the Facts
- Atomic Number (number of protons in the nucleus): 8
- Atomic Symbol (on the Periodic Table of Elements): O
- Atomic Weight (average mass of the atom): 15.9994
- Density: 0.001429 grams per cubic centimeter
- Phase at Room Temperature: Gas
- Melting Point: minus 361.82 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 218.79 degrees Celsius)
- Boiling Point: minus 297.31 degrees F (minus 182.95 degrees C)
- Number of isotopes (atoms of the same element with a different number of neutrons): 11; three stable
- Most common isotopes: O-16 (99.757 percent natural abundance)
Breath of life
Oxygen is the third most abundant element in the universe, according to the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility. However, its reactivity made it relatively rare in early Earth’s atmosphere.
Cyanobacteria, which are organisms that “breathe” using photosynthesis, take in carbon dioxide and exhale oxygen, just like modern plants. Cyanobacteria were likely responsible for the first oxygen on Earth, an event grandly known as the Great Oxidation Event.
Photosynthesis by cyanobacteria was likely ongoing before significant levels of oxygen built up in Earth’s atmosphere; a March 2014 study published in the journal Nature Geoscience found that 2.95 billion-year-old rocks found in South Africa contained oxides that would have required free oxygen to form. These rocks were originally in shallow seas, suggesting that oxygen from photosynthesis first began to accumulate in marine environments about half a billion years before it began to accumulate in the atmosphere around 2.5 billion years ago.
Life today depends heavily on oxygen, but the initial build-up of this element in the atmosphere was nothing short of a disaster. The new atmosphere caused a mass extinction of anaerobes, which are organisms that don’t require oxygen. Anaerobes that were unable to adapt or survive in the presence of oxygen died off in this new world. [Infographic: Earth’s Atmosphere Top to Bottom]
Fast forward — way forward. The first inkling humans had of the existence of oxygen as an element was in 1608, when Dutch inventor Cornelius Drebbel reported that the heating of saltpeter (potassium nitrate) released a gas, according to the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC). The identity of that gas remained a mystery until the 1770s, when three chemists converged on its discovery more or less at the same time. English chemist and clergyman Joseph Priestly isolated oxygen by shining sunlight on mercuric oxide and collecting the gas from the reaction. He noted that a candle burned more brightly in this gas, according to the RSC, thanks to oxygen’s role in combustion.
Priestly published his findings in 1774, beating out Swiss scientist Carl Wilhelm Steele, who had actually isolated oxygen in 1771 and written about it, but not published the work. Oxygen’s third discoverer was Antoine-Laurent de Lavoisier, a French chemist who gave the element its name. The word comes from the Greek “oxy” and “genes,” meaning “acid-forming.”
Oxygen has eight total electrons — two orbit the nucleus in the atom’s inner shell and six orbit in the outermost shell. The outermost shell can hold a total of eight electrons, which explains oxygen’s tendency to react with other elements: Its outer shell is incomplete, and electrons are thus free for the taking (and giving).
- As a gas, oxygen is clear. But as a liquid, it’s pale blue.
- If you’ve ever wondered what swimming in a pool of liquid oxygen would be like, the answer is: very, very cold, according to Carl Zorn of the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility. Oxygen must get down to minus 297.3 F (minus 183.0 C) to liquefy, so frostbite would be a problem.
- Too little oxygen is problematic. So is too much. Breathing 80 percent oxygen for more than 12 hours irritates the respiratory tract and can eventually cause deadly fluid build-up, or edema, according to the University of Florida and the company Air Products.
- Oxygen is one tough cookie: A 2012 study published in the journal Physical Review Letters found than an oxygen molecule (O2) can survive pressures 19 million times higher than atmospheric pressure.
- The lowest levels of oxygen ever recorded in human blood were measured near the summit of Mount Everest in 2009. Climbers had arterial oxygen levels of 3.28 kilopascals on average. Compare that to the normal value of 12 to 14 kilopascals, and the mountaineering term “death zone” makes plenty of sense. The findings were published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
- Thank goodness for an atmosphere of 21 percent oxygen. About 300 million years ago, when oxygen levels reached 35 percent, insects were able to grow super-large: Think dragonflies with the wingspans of hawks.
Oxygen forms in the hearts of stars, with the fusion of a carbon-12 nucleus and a helium-4 nucleus (also known as an alpha particle). It’s only recently, however, that scientists have been able to peer into the nucleus of oxygen and unravel its structure.
In March 2014, North Carolina State University physicist Dean Lee and his colleagues reported that they’d figured out the nuclear structure of oxygen-16, the most common isotope of oxygen, in its ground state (the state at which all electrons are at the lowest possible energy levels) and in its first excited state (the next energy level up).
Why should such a thing matter? Well, to understand how nuclei form in stars — from carbon to oxygen to heavier elements — is to understand how the very building blocks of the universe snap together. Lee and his team originally discovered that the nucleus of a carbon-12 molecule, with its six protons and six neutrons, is actually made of three particle clusters, each with two protons and two neutrons. If carbon-12 had three of these so-called alpha clusters, the researchers reasoned, oxygen-16 was likely to have four, given that it has eight protons and eight neutrons.
Using supercomputer simulations and a numerical lattice, the researchers were able to see how the particles in an oxygen-16 nucleus would arrange themselves. They found that in the ground state of oxygen-16, there are indeed four alpha clusters, arranged neatly in a tetrahedron.
“These alpha clusters are sort of like little fuzzy spheres of these four particles, or these nucleons, and these fuzzy spheres like to touch each other by some surface interaction,” Lee told Live Science. The tetrahedron configuration allows them to get nice and snug.
But there was another quantum mystery waiting to be unraveled. The ground state of oxygen-16 and the first excited state share an unusual feature. They both have the same spin — a value indicating how the particles rotate. They also both have positive parity, a way to indicate symmetry. Imagine inverting left and right in the entire universe, but having to keep subatomic particles in the same shape. Particles with positive parity would be able to look in this mirror universe and see themselves as they are. Particles with negative parity would have to flip-flop, lest they end up backwards like a line of text read in a mirror.
“The mystery was why the lowest two states of oxygen-16 have zero spin and positive parity,” Lee said, given that the states are different.
The simulations gave an answer: In its excited state, oxygen-16 rearranges its nucleus to look little like the ground state at all. Instead of a tetrahedral arrangement, the alpha particles arrange themselves in a square or near-square plane.
“Their underlying intrinsic structures were different,” Lee said. The totally different configuration explains how spin and parity could remain the same — the nuclei take different paths to the same result.
There are still more quantum interactions in the oxygen-16 nucleus to detangle, Lee said, and finer-grained detail to discover.
“There are actually quite a lot of interesting things going inside of little things like nuclei,” he said. “And there are stories that are being told about how they are being made that we are now starting to be able to address.”
Lee’s work looks to oxygen’s birth in the stars; another line of oxygen research focuses on the element’s role in life on Earth. Shortly after the Great Oxidation Event some 2.4 billion years ago, oxygen levels may have reached or exceeded today’s levels before crashing, said Daniel Mills, a doctoral candidate at the Nordic Center for Earth Evolution at the University of Southern Denmark. Animal life didn’t show up until far later, with the simplest animals appearing around 600 million years ago.
Despite theories that the rise of oxygen paved the way for the existence of animals, the story appears to be far more complex. Animals did not appear during the first significant bump in Earth’s oxygen levels 2.4 billion years ago. And in February 2014, Mills and his colleagues reported in the journal PNAS that modern-day sponges can still breathe, eat and even grow in oxygen levels 0.5 percent to 4 percent of what is found in Earth’s atmosphere today. Sponges are the probably the most similar living animal to the first animals on Earth, Mills told Live Science.
The finding that sponges don’t need high oxygen to live suggests that something else contributed to the rise of the first animal life — though rising oxygen may well have been necessary to reach the kind of diversity and ecosystems we see today, Mills said. Even in the modern era, animals such as nematode worms thrive in low-oxygen areas of the ocean, he added.
“There is clearly more to animal evolution than an ample supply of oxygen,” Mills said.
Oxygen & The Human Circulatory System
- An interactive graphic created by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute also shows the geologic history of oxygen, beginning about 3.8 billion years ago.
- Learn more about what makes up Earth’s atmosphere today, all about air pressure and volume, and weather at this kids site by the National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Black Salve is a herbal based product, featuring two principal herbs that are said historically to have pharmacologically demonstrated anti-cancer properties, Blood Root (Sanguinaria canadensis) and Chaparral (Larrea mexicata). Recent versions of Black Salve include Galangal root (Alpinia officinarium) or Ginger root (Zingiber officinale), and sometimes Graviola leaf (Annona muricata).
The use of Black Salves for the treatment of skin dosorders & cancers has a chequered history of claims and counter claims by those who are believers, and by those who criticize its usage. More recently, towards the latter part of last century, more refined versions of Black Salves have been used extensively with different names, including HerbVeil8 and Cansema.
You Make Your Own Mind Up After This Informative Research!
My Personal Advice-
Safe With Best Practices
The Really Good Oil Australia uses Hemp that is grown organically in Denmark, a country renowned for his high standards in soil care and low levels of pollution. Unlike other manufacturers who source their hemp from China or make their CBD products from the leftovers of the hemp fibre industry.
Fast Delivery, Secure, Supplying Both Local Australian & International Markets.
With Australia Post Tracking ID# Both Local & International. No long delays, no forms to fill in, no waiting for customs clearance.
The Really Good Oil Australia brand products are all organically produced & controlled the entire process from seed to shelf. Because we have 100% control of the whole manufacturing process we are proud to say that our CBD products are the highest quality you can buy. We believe in transparency and back up our claims with facts not hype.
The Really Good Oil Australia brand with its Manufacturer is one of the few parent companies to be awarded a GMP certificate. Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) is a system for ensuring that products are consistently produced and controlled according to quality standards. It is designed to minimize the risks involved in any pharmaceutical production that cannot be eliminated through testing the final product. Ask any other producer you are considering to purchase from for their GMP certificate number if they have one.Hemp CBD Quality Control
In the hemp industry, there is a general lack of standards for producers. Most public laboratories have difficulties collecting reliable test results for a number of reasons. We treat testing very seriously here at The Really Good Oil Australia and thus our Manufacturer spends large amounts of money and resources doing quality control. We strive to constantly improve our product and to ensure the quality and consistency of our product is consistently above par.